Intellectual Property Insurance Webinar Q&A Follow Up

We had so many great questions come in during our Intellectual Property Insurance webinar earlier this month and the speakers were gracious enough to spend some time putting together answers to some of those questions we were unable to address live.

1. Briefly discuss IP exclusions on the Cyber form.

IP related losses are generally excluded from Cyber coverage.

However, some carriers are willing to cover losses relating to contractual indemnity obligations in the event that an Insured loses a third party’s trade secret information due to a cyber incident.

2. Can you talk specifically about policies designed to cover only trademarks? Many small companies have logos and firm names similar to larger unrelated companies and want protection from litigation.

A good defensive IP policy is designed to be flexible and is customized for each buyer so that it covers only what the Insured wants to protect.  For example, a company that wants to protect certain brand-related IP assets can schedule only those assets and thus customize the defensive IP policy to apply exactly to what they are trying to protect.

3. Insured is selling a water bottle on their website that they co-designed and imported from Chinese Manufacturer. Being accused of patent infringement for water bottle design. 

What type of policy do they need to protect them against claims such as this? 

They may be able to protect against catastrophic loss in the ongoing suit by purchasing a specific contingency policy. A defensive policy will provide protection against future infringement claims.

4. Is there still a typical “vetting” fee upfront before firm quote can be received?

There are carriers available that can usually provide an initial quote without charging a fee, However, when special protections are requested, such as defense against claims of trade secret misappropriation, an initial underwriting fee may be required.

5. Do you need a lawyers confirmation there is no infringement before insuring?

No, IP underwriters typically rely on in-house analysis and bring in outside counsel on an as-needed basis.

6. What about indemnity to a customer for infringement claims he may face from use of a product?

A defensive IP policy protects an alleged infringer against such claims.  The entity that is concerned that they will be alleged to infringe can obtain a defensive IP policy to protect itself or can request a contractual indemnification from their suppliers.

A component of a good defensive IP insurance policy is a contractual indemnification backstop, which can protect such a supplier from losses related to such contractual indemnity obligations.

In conclusion, there are two ways to solve for this problem, both of which allow for risk transfer through a defensive IP policy.

7. How often do the carriers get involved in the valuation of the IP? How/how often?

Underwriters of defensive IP insurance are concerned with the potential losses that will be covered by such a policy, including defense costs, damages from infringement claims related to products or services, and contractual indemnification obligations.  While damages from infringement claims related to products or services require an understanding of the value relating to such products or services, defensive IP underwriters do not value IP assets.

Residual value insurance is a different type of IP insurance that was not the subject of this webinar.  Residual Value underwriters will conduct an exercise to value IP assets as part of their underwriting process.

Did you miss the live webinar? PLUS members can access the on-demand recording here.

Thank you again to our speakers!

Dan Auslander headshot

 

Dan Auslander
Director of Marketing & Development at Ambridge Partners

 

 

 

Sean Doyle headshot

 

Sean Doyle
Intellectual Property Counsel at Ambridge Partners

 

 

 

Douglas Kine headshot

 

Douglas Kline
Partner, Chair IP Litigation at Goodwin

 

 

 

Jason Sandler headshot

 

Jason Sandler
Vice President at Marsh FINPRO

Continuing The Cyan Decision Discussion

Last Wednesday, December 12, PLUS hosted a webinar on the Cyan Decision and “The Post-Cyan Securities Litigation Landscape.” Two of the speakers from that webinar, Doug Greene and Nick Porritt, were able to get together and answer audience questions as well as expand on a few of the topics touched on during the webinar. Listen below to this additional look into the Cyan Decision!

GREENE_DouglasDoug Greene leads BakerHostetler’s firmwide Securities and Governance Litigation Team. Doug has focused on such cases since 1997 and is among a handful of full-time practitioners nationwide. Doug works hard to shape securities law, so that executives can speak publicly without fear of unfair liability. He is committed to making the merits matter again, especially in these smaller cases, by restoring a specialized defense bar; increasing defense counsel’s effectiveness and efficiency; and creating greater collegiality among defense counsel, insurers, and brokers – all critical characteristics in the post-Cyan era.

Porritt_NicholasNicholas I. Porritt prosecutes securities class actions, shareholder class actions, derivative actions, and mergers and acquisitions litigation. He has extensive experience representing plaintiffs and defendants in a wide variety of complex commercial litigation, including civil fraud, breach of contract, and professional malpractice, as well as defending SEC investigations and enforcement actions.

Missed the Cyan Decision webinar? PLUS Members can view past webinars on the PLUS website here.

Read more about this topic in the PLUS Journal article, “The Coming Securities Class Action Storm: Multijurisdictional Litigation After Cyan.”

Interested in more PLUS Webinars? Visit the PLUS website for more information on future webinars, and click here to register for the upcoming webinar on Wednesday, January 16, 2019: “Securities Litigation Reform.”